If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On September 16, 2012, at around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) heard that the “Dju store” operated by the Victim C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, would not sell alcoholic beverages from E, its employee, etc.; and (b) took a bath, such as “this spopic spopic spopic spopic spopic spopching,” “spopic spopching,” “Popching,” and “Popching spopching spopic spacts,” and prevented the victim from selling alcoholic beverages over about 20 minutes from around 0:25 of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, taking into account all the circumstances of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence was determined as ordered.