beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.12.11 2015고정675

의료법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A medical person shall record in detail his/her main symptoms, results of diagnosis or diagnosis, name of diagnosis, progress of medical treatment, etc. in the medical records, and shall not prepare a false medical record, etc. or make an additional statement or revision intentionally differently from

On March 27, 2012, the Defendant, with C Hospital sex surgery and doctor, performed non-cerebral d's coke surgery on the patient D's coke.

1. On April 19, 2012, the Defendant complained of the Plaintiff’s pain at the G Hospital E’s sexual surgery and the outpatient medical room located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, that “Iskam continuously farc, even though he is taking advantage of the truth-control prescribed by the NW.” on the electronic medical record system, the Defendant did not record the major symptoms in the medical record because he did not state any pain on the symptoms complaining of D, without being being found to have a pain on the electronic medical record system, and instead did not state them in detail. At the same time, the Defendant prepared a false medical record, etc.

2. D, with the total of nine months after the operation, continued pain, D taken CT CDs from G image department located in F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on December 26, 2012. On the same day, D’s mother H showed D’s cT CDs to the Defendant at the above C Hospital sexual surgery and the outpatient clinic, and again requested D’s her mother H expressed D’s cT CDs to the Defendant, and “I would have to have his son still left.”

In addition, H posted the Defendant’s answer to the “customer’s sound” on the C Hospital website on December 28, 2012, January 3, 2013, and April 23, 2013 on three occasions, on which nine months to one year after the surgery had been performed, and even after nine months to one year from the surgery, he/she was well aware that the Defendant responded to this, and that he/she continues to appeal to D with the pain.

On May 6, 2013, the Defendant, at the above C Hospital’s sexual surgery room, opened to H and D, asking questions as to whether the operation was wrong and the pain continues to continue to exist in coaches.