1. The victim C with interference with business shall have served as the exclusive doctor in the above emergency room, the victim F and G as the nurse in the above emergency room, and the victim H as the administrative staff in charge of the receipt and receipt of the above emergency room, respectively, in the E Hospital emergency room in Jinju-si.

At around 01:30 on September 1, 2015, the Defendant found that he was in need of emergency medical treatment in the above emergency room, and, without any reason, obstructed the work of the victims, such as the receipt of the emergency medical treatment and the emergency room by force of approximately 40 minutes, by taking advantage of the following: (a) the Defendant stated that he was able to engage in an emergency medical treatment in the above emergency room, and without any reason, that he was able to say that he was “Chewing, grings, grings, grings, grings, grings, and grings, grings, and grings.

2. On September 1, 2015, the injured Defendant, at the emergency room around 02:15, recommended the victim’s H (the 22 years of age), by avoiding the disturbance as above, to stop home, and recommended him/her to do so, the victim’s left-hand cream at one time, and the victim, who was pushed the Defendant out of the emergency room, spawned the victim’s right-hand eye, and spawned the victim to undergo treatment for about seven days, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each investigation report (in relation to attachment of an injury diagnosis report, etc., attachment of the 112-reported case processing statement, attachment of CCTV images in an emergency room), screen pictures, screen pictures, video CDs, video CDs, 112-reported case records, CCTV-faging photographs, and CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime of interference with business among the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing criteria are as follows: some of the crimes of this case are in the ordinary competition relationship under Article 40 of the Criminal Act.